I must be asleep at the proverbial who’s who in the modeling
world wheel because when I kept seeing the latest Kate Upton is Fat headlines going
by I had no idea who she was.
Today one headline from Fox News caught my attention enough
to click through: Kate Upton blasts critics: 'I'm not going to starve just tobe thin.'
Oh! I said to
myself—they’re talking about that woman
from the Sports Illustrated cover.
Wait a minute…someone called her lardy?!
Skinny Gossip, a pro-skinny website, thinks she’s fat!
“Look, I’ll admit – I love In’n’Out as much as the next gurl, but it’s not supposed to be an everyday thing, Kate! And we can be sure that Kate is the rare model who poses with food – and then actually devours it.
She doesn’t just look vulgar – she’s also never afraid to act the part…she is easily the most “porny” model to enter the mainstream in a very long time. She looks like she would work in the back of a motorcycle shop in Nashville and give (bad) blow jobs for $25.”
Wow. I know about the pro-anorexia sites out there that put
super-skinny models and actresses and models on pedestals as beacons of what
women should strive to be, but I didn’t know they also bashed fuller-figured
ones as well.
And I say fuller-figured with a bit of a suppressed chuckle
because we all know that Upton is by no means fat or full-figured even, she is
voluptuous, which is quite different.
I’m glad that Upton laughed off the comments: “I’m not going
to starve just to be thin. I want to enjoy life, and I can’t if I’m not eating
and miserable," she said, according to The Sun.
But really, if there are women out there who would call a SI
model “well-marbled,” what image of an ideal body type do they have in mind?
Are we so used to seeing sickly-skinny models that one with a teensy bit of flesh
is considered fat?
